Dolphin Flipper vs. Human Arm/ Hand
a. Two different species that posses the homologous
trait are dolphins and humans. The dolphin flipper and the human arm/hand have
similar structures.
b. The dolphin flippers act as stabilisers and are used for
steering, while swimming, and can act as brakes, along with the tail. They are
made of collagen- rich connective tissue, that are very similar to the bones
inside a humans arm and hand. The joint that is comparable to the elbow is
located at the body surface. The humerus has a large- globular head where it
meets the scapula in the shoulder joint. Arteries in the flipers are surrounded
by veins. So, some heat from the blood traveling through the arteries is
transferred to the venous blood. This countercurrent heat exchange aids
dolphins in conserving body heat. To shed excess body heat, circulation
increases in veins near the surface of the flippers and decreases in veins
returning to the body core.
The humerus articulates with the
scapula at the shoulder and with the radius and ulna at the elbow. It is a long
bone that is essential for movement and support of the arm. The brachial artery
travels most of the bones length. The brachial artery branches into several
arteries, distributing oxygenated blood from the lungs and heart. The hand
exhibits great mobility and flexibility in the digits and in the whole organ.
The complex abilities of the hand are part of what makes humans unique. The
hand gives us a forceful grip and we use our hands the most out of anything
else on our body. The structures are different
between dolphins and humans because the human’s arms are much longer than a
dolphin’s flipper. Also, humans a more vertical and dolphins swim more
horizontal.
c. The common ancestor of dolphins are Pakicetus. We
know this because its legs
are shorter, and its hands and feet are enlarged like paddles. Its tail is
longer and more muscular, too. The
ear region of the skull resembles fossil and modern whales, and the teeth and
other features are similar to those of some fossil whales. Whales and dolphins
come from the same common ancestor. The common ancestor of humans is the Chimpanzee. Shoulder shape tracks changes in
early human behavior such as reduced climbing and increased tool use.
Chimpanzees are the closest living relatives to humans.
d.

Bird Wing vs. Bat Wing
a. Two different species that posses the analogous trait
are birds and bats. I chose the wings on a bird versus the wings on a bat.
b. Bird and bat
wings are analogous because they have separate evolutionary origins, but are
superficially similar because they evolved to serve the same function. Bird wings and bat wings are analogous as flight structures: their
structure and function have evolved by different routes from a flightless
reptilian ancestor. A good portion of the flight surface in bats consists of a
membrane stretched between the extended digits in the hand, whereas the digits
of the bird are relatively small and do not support the flight surface. Birds have the same arm bones as
humans and bats, but the bones are arranged in their wings very differently
than the bones in bat wings. Bird
and bat bones look small and delicate. This was thought to make both bird and
bat bones lighter so they can fly.
c. The discovery
that birds evolved from small carnivorous dinosaurs of the Late Jurassic. The
common ancestor of bats Laurasiatheria; which is a superorder
of placental mammals. Because
Laurasiatheria is defined by DNA sequence analysis, the group does not share any obvious anatomical features. So,
this branches into categories. Bats
are mammals in the order Chiroptera. They are the only
mammals that can fly. In these categories also include carnivores. Bats and
birds are not genetically related because the structure in their wings and the
way they fly are fairly different. Birds have more gaps and feathers in their
wings to help them glide through the air whereas bat wings don’t, so it seems
as they are swimming through air.
So because my pictures are not popping up for some reason, here are the links to the pictures:
ReplyDeleteusatoday30.usatoday.com- Dolphin flipper
www.creativecrash.com- Human arm/ hand
evolutionbioc334.blogspot.com- Anatomy
digitalresult.com- Bird flying
www.livescience.com- Bat flying
askabiologist.asu.edu- Anatomy
Okay, but this needed to be fixed so your readers could view them. These also aren't specific enough links to take your viewers to your images.
DeleteEmail me if you need help posting images. There is also a help page on the course blog for posting images. You need to either save the image to your computer an upload it or use the direct url to insert the image. It looks like you might just have tired copy/pasting the url into your text field.
WOW! good job! The animals you chose were very interesting! I enjoyed reading all about it! The homologous trait of your choosing was very informative. I got my pictures by dragging them from google. Maybe that will work for you next time! Overall good job!
ReplyDeleteHi there Nicole!
ReplyDeleteIt's a bummer that your images didn't work in the post, but thank you for providing them in the comments below. That was really appreciated!
I like that you chose to compare a dolphin's fin and a human arm-- you provided a lot of information on just what makes both unique compared to the other. The little tidbit about how directional swimming was interesting, as well.
Hi Nicole,
ReplyDeleteGreat Job! I see we both chose the same example for the homologous trait. I think your answers were explained in great detail and it was easy for me to follow. I think you did a better job at finding research leading to the answer of the ancestors for both the dolphin and human than myself.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI checked in all three browsers (firefox, chrome and IE) and your images don't work in any of them. Make sure you double check that before you walk away from the assignment.
ReplyDeleteVery good and thorough description and explanation of your homologous pairing.
I don't think you understand what is being asked for when the guidelines refer to "common ancestor". When that term is used, it is asking for the common ancestor of both dolphins and humans together, not two separate common ancestors of dolphins (as a group) and humans (as a group).
Another very important point on your identification of chimpanzees as an ancestor of humans. NO! Not correct. Humans did NOT evolve from chimpanzees. This is like saying you descended from your cousins. Humans and chimpanzees are modern organisms. One could not give rise to another. What you can say is that humans and chimpanzees share a common ancestor from about 13 million years ago (a date that has recently been adjusted, with former estimates about 7 mya). The common ancestor was ape-like, but it was neither a modern chimp or a modern human.
So here is what you needed to figure out to confirm that the forelimbs of dolphins and humans are homologs. Both humans and dolphins are mammals. That means they share a common archaic mammalian ancestor. We know from fossil evidence that early mammals possessed the ancestral forelimb structure and passed this trait onto both humans and dolphins, with differences arising due to different environmental pressures (i.e., divergent evolution). That confirms the requirements for these traits to be homologous.
For your analogous pairings, very good description and explanations of the process of convergent evolution that produced them, but again you get stuck on the issue of a common ancestor. We know that both birds (in general) and bats (mammals) arose from a common archaic reptilian ancestor. We also know from fossil evidence that wings arose in both birds and bats well after this evolutionary split occurred. Bird wings evolved during the split from reptiles, much later in the evolutionary process, and bat wings evolved after their split from other mammals, again, long after that split with common reptilian ancestor. That is what we need to know to confirm that both birds and bats evolved wings independently, not from common descent.
Make sure you understand this concept of common ancestor and how it is necessary when discussing analogs and homologs.