1. The
Piltdown Hoax was such a clever hoax it fooled scientists for more than 40
years. The Piltodown Hoax was a hoax in which bone fragments were presented as
the fossilized remains of a jawbone from a previously unknown early human in
1912 by an amateur archaeologist,
Charles Dawson. People wanted so badly to find the evidence for the connection
between humans and apes. After this finding, Dawson invited England’s leading archaeologist, Arthur Smith Woodward,
and French archaeologist, Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, to Piltdown where the
first discovery of the jawbone was made. These three men concluded that the
jawbone that was discovered shows the connection between the apes and humans. Scientists
believed that England also had human fossils like others and that England’s
human ancestors might be the oldest out of any ancestors. For the next decade,
people were obsessed with the model of Piltdown man and of human evolution even
though there were no other Piltdown fossils discovered after Charles Dawson
died. However, there were ancient
fossils of human ancestors found in other continents that conflicted with the
Piltdown findings. But because scientists did not have the proper tools and
knowledge, they were not able to explain the difference in Piltdown discoveries
and the fossils from other continents. But that did not stop scientist’s years
later for finding a way to figure out the truth about these fossils and
concluded that someone forged the Piltdown Fossils.
2. The
mistake here was England jumped to conclusions so fast because they wanted to
prove so badly that human origins were from Britain and the search for the evidence connection between
apes and humans was very intense, they stated that the fossil found could be the oldest human like
fossil. It was said that the hoax started with Charles Dawson’s ambition and
pride and it went on for so long because people would have believed anything
that led them to finding the connection between apes and humans, they were
willing to ignore the facts. Pride and respect was taken from England because
of this hoax.
3. The positive aspects here were that scientists were able to prove
that the fossil they found was rather young. By measuring the flouring content
of fossils, scientists could roughly date them. So because of this, scientists
used fluorine on the Piltdown fossils. The staining on the burn was superficial
and the material was cut probably using a steel knife. Also, the jaw- bone
dated back to less than 100 years and came from a female orangutan because they
noticed that a canine tooth was cut down using a knife. It was very smart of
them to test everything possible to know everything about these fossils and
finally prove the truth.
4. I do not think it is possible to remove human factor from science because everyone makes mistakes and everyone has their own theory on everything. Even though someone may be wrong does not mean that everything is a hoax. That is why it is important to always check every finding to find out the truth. If the person is wrong than so be it, but chances are they can be right. This hoax was different because no one bothers to fact check the findings until years later.
5. What I learned
from this historical event is that it is so important to fact check everything
that comes to you. You should always put it the effort no mater how long it
takes to fact check and thoroughly examine the truth for whatever is told. Also,
it is important to put your pride aside when it comes to science because it is
so easy to be wrong. Definitely fact- check the truth.
"People wanted so badly to find the evidence for the connection between humans and apes."
ReplyDeleteWe already had evidence for this. The point is that England had never found hominid fossils in their own soil up to that point, and that is what might have driven the acceptance of this discovery.
Beyond that, it is important to recognize that the phrase "connection between humans and apes" is essentially saying "missing link" and carries with it the same errors in logic. By this time, it wasn't really an issue as to whether humans and non-human apes (see how I phrased that?) were related. It wasn't about "if" they were genetically related, but how humans had evolved from that common ancestor with non-human apes. So what would this discovery have taught us about "how" humans evolved? Why was the size of the Piltdown cranium relative to the comparatively "primitive" nature of the Piltdown jaw?
Otherwise, good synopsis.
Great discussion on the issue of faults. Yes, there were faults on both sides, on the side of the scientific community that accepted this discovery too quickly and on the side of the culprits who created the hoax in the first place.
Good job explaining the process that uncovered the hoax. But why were scientists still studying this find some 40 years after it was uncovered? What aspect of science does that represent?
Do humans only contribute negative aspects to the scientific process? Do they bring anything positive to the process that you would not want to lose? How about curiosity, ingenuity and innovation? Could we even do science without these factors?
Good life lesson.
Hi Nicole! I enjoyed your post! Especially the portion about removing humans from science. I also do not believe that just because one person made a poor decision, that others findings should be doubted. That was one bad case out of thousands of legitimate ones! I also agree that we are all human and emotions cloud out judgment at times! Very unfortunate that it happened but at least the science community figured it out eventually! I thought your life lesson was a good one! Fact checking is beneficial throughout our lives with almost anything! Being educated about a topic is important, especially with science!
ReplyDeleteI like how in number two you said how the country wanted this find as bad as the discoverer/creator. It gives a different perspective on how society would encourage and not question a discovery as such. They wanted to be put on the map and compete with the other countries that have found million year old bones.
ReplyDeleteGood job!
I also liked that in question number two how you pointed out the fact that England was rushing to conclusions, I think the news was so exciting that they were quick to spread the news and no one thought to question the information that was being put out there. I also like that you said that just because in that scenario it was a hoax, doesn't mean that everything is a hoax and we can't go around being skeptical about everything.
ReplyDeleteyou did a good job at summarizing what was needed and following your explanations with personal input. post flows very well and easy to read. format also helps in making sure you hit all the points. always fact check. good job!
ReplyDelete